PPP Loans - Changes


Michael Hunsche • February 15, 2021

Share this article

The most talked about program from the CARES Act was the PPP Loan program. Designed to provide instant cash inflows to struggling businesses to help cover the cost of payroll and other operating expenses. The first round was distributed so fast it ran out of money in only a few days, the second round last a few weeks, and in December a third round was released which fortunately is still funded.



We will run over a brief overview of this program and consider to have two parts. Part one is the CARES Act disbursements (1 and 2) and the second part is the CAA disbursements (part 3).


Part 1

To qualify for the PPP originally you needed to have wages in 2019. You took your monthly average, multiplied that by 2.5 and that was your loan, in a simple manner of speaking. You then had 8 weeks to pay that loan out in the form of wages, rent, and utilities, which was then changed to 24 weeks.


Assuming you were able to pay it all out, the loan would be forgiven and nothing was owed back to the SBA. The IRS then came out and released a statement that the forgiven loan would essentially become taxable as you would not be allowed to deduct the expenses paid with the loan proceeds.


There was no requirement to prove you had to receive the funds, it was simply a matter of applying. The catch with the PPP Loan was that you could not also take the Employee Retention Credit, and, if you received an EIDL advance, that advance would reduce how much of the loan was forgiven. In short, you shouldn't receive free money from both the PPP loan and EIDL. The CAA eliminated this part.


Part 2

In December 2020 the CAA released a second formal disbursement to help struggling businesses in the form an additional PPP loan. This time around however Congress added the wrinkle that not only did you have to be in business, you had to show a 25% drop in Gross Receipts either in total for 2020 v 2019, or in a single quarter. For most businesses, this was Q2, and they qualified, so they took a second round.


What did the CAA change?

The CAA had some massive changes to the PPP loan program. The first was that businesses could now qualify for, and receive the Employee Retention Credit if they also received a PPP loan. They simply had to identify what wages were used for the PPP Loan and what wages were used for the ERC. The second was that any business who did not take the initial Round 1 PPP Loan, could now apply for Round 1, use the funds, then apply for the CAA round 2. This means a business could receive the same PPP Loan twice in the space of a few months. Third, for a business to qualify for Round 2, they had to show a need in the form of a drop in Gross Receipts of 25% or more. To show this, the business would simply show their Gross Receipts (Profit and Loss statement income line for example) and show a Quarterly comparison of 2019 to 2020 or annual comparison. If there was a drop of 25% or more, they qualified. Lastly, to qualify for Round 2 you had to pay out wages for the period that covered February 15th 2020. If you paid wages on a monthly basis, for example, and paid out for the month of February, you qualified.


Change for Farmers

In the first round PPP Loan Farmers were left out in the cold, so to speak. They based PPP funding off Net Income, which most farmers simply didn't have. As a result, they did not get loans. With the CAA changes, farmers could now qualify based off GROSS RECEIPTS, instead of Net Income. Using the same average monthly receipts multiplied by 2.5 farmers were limited to $100K in gross receipts, for a max PPP Loan of $20,833. All they had to show was a Sch F with Gross Receipts, an application, and a bank account showing they existed February 15, 2020. This is a major help for small farmers and is often overlooked.


Schedule C Filers

Another area often overlooked is with Sch C businesses. If they had net income they qualify for the first round. If they can show a drop in revenue they qualify for round 2. Many small businesses assumed they don't qualify because they were not full time, or because maybe their spouse worked full time, or any number of reasons, but if they have a Sch C, they most likely qualify and it is worth talking with a banker about.

View More of Our Most Recent Posts

By Michael Hunsche August 18, 2026
In my last post, I talked about starting this firm from the back of a closet with one client, a makeshift desk, and an old power strip. But I didn’t start a CPA firm because I had always dreamed of owning a CPA firm. I started it because the traditional model didn’t make sense to me — especially after starting a small side business of my own and seeing things from the business owner’s side. Clients would send information into a black hole and wonder when they would hear back. Business owners would meet with their accountant after the year was already over, when most of the opportunities to actually change the outcome were gone. Large firms often reserved their best advice and attention for their largest clients, even though smaller business owners arguably needed that guidance more. Tax returns became the service instead of what I believed they should be: the end result of conversations happening throughout the year. And too often, the accountant knew the numbers but didn’t really know the business. None of that made sense to me. I thought a CPA firm could be more than the place you send documents once a year. I thought we could help business owners make better decisions before those decisions showed up on a tax return. That idea became the foundation of the firm. Pricing was another problem. At the first firm I worked for, we had “dynamic” pricing. In practice, that could mean charging a client more after a good year to supposedly make up for years when their bill had been discounted. Other clients might go an incredibly long time without receiving a bill, only to suddenly get hit with a huge invoice. As someone trying to run a business myself, I couldn’t understand that. How could a business owner budget for a professional relationship without knowing what it was going to cost? The traditional model was built around billing for time, yet employees were constantly being told to work faster. That created the wrong incentives. The focus became completing the deliverable efficiently instead of asking what else the client needed to know. Payroll could become an afterthought. Bookkeeping could become work used to fill the slower months. Questions about a client’s history could be viewed as time taking away from the task at hand. The system rewarded completing work. I wanted a system that rewarded helping the client. So when I started the firm in 2017, the concept was pretty simple. Find out what the client actually needs. Agree on the scope. Give them a predictable monthly price. Review that relationship every 9–12 months and adjust when their needs change. And most importantly, don’t disappear between tax returns. From the beginning, I wanted the relationship to include tax return preparation, mid-year tax planning, year-end planning, and responsive communication throughout the year. At the time, proactive planning and upfront pricing were far less common in the small-business CPA market. A business owner getting a call that said, “Let’s meet in July and see how the first half of the year went,” was not the experience many owners expected from their accountant. But it made perfect sense to me. If we waited until tax season to have that conversation, we weren’t planning anymore. We were reporting history. The response was great — once I could get business owners to give a new firm a chance. Over time, that simple concept grew into something much bigger. People smarter than me helped develop it into what the profession now broadly calls advisory, with a much wider scope and greater ambition than what I originally envisioned. But the underlying idea hasn’t changed. Business owners deserve to know what they’re paying. They deserve honest advice, even when the answer isn’t what they expected. They deserve regular conversations about what is happening in their business and what is coming next. And they deserve a CPA who understands that the goal isn’t simply to produce an accurate tax return. The goal is to help them make better decisions before we get there. That’s why I started the firm. Transparent pricing. Honest advice. Regular conversations.  Built for Business Owners. CPA Led. Strategy Focused.
By Michael Hunsche August 14, 2026
An old power strip from my beginning became an unexpected reminder of how easy it is for business owners to overlook how far they’ve come.
By Michael Hunsche August 11, 2026
Our family-owned CPA firm started with almost no clients, no employees, and a closet for an office. Here’s why we started—and what hasn’t changed.