Indiana PTE Tax Bill


Michael Hunsche • March 1, 2023

Share this article

On February 22, 2023 Governor Holcomb signed into law Senate Bill 2, a bill that saw Indiana join 29 other states in enacting a Pass-Through Entity (PTE) Tax. The idea behind this bill, and other PTE bills, is to shift the tax burdeon off of the individual owners who are limited at deducting $10,000 in State and Local Taxes (SALT) on their Federal Schedule A over to the business entity. The SALT limit was a result of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA).


The TCJA increased the standard deduction from $12,000 to $24,000 for married couples. In addition to this increase, the GOP controlled congress also capped the SALT deduction at $10,000. They did this under the reasoning that liberal states had higher state taxes, and thus were getting an unfair tax deduction compared to their more conservative states with lower taxes. We wish we could say we were joking, but that is actually where the state of our federal politicians has sunk to. 


Almost immediately after the TCJA was passed in 2018, Connecticut enacted the first PTE bill that allowed all Partnerships and S Corporations to elect to pay the state income tax that was generated by them. This allowed a business owner to claim a federal income tax expense on their business for the state income taxes paid on their business income. Prior to this the state income taxes paid would be subject to the SALT limit, and paid at the owner level.


So in 2017 if a business made $100,000 in profits, and a state had a 5% income tax, the business owner would have had a tax bill of $5,000 just off the business income. If that same business owner had real estate taxes and withholding taxes from their W-2 wages of $6,000 in total, the business owner would only get to deduct $10,000 in taxes, even though they had paid $11,000 in total. 


With this new PTE tax change, the business owner can now deduct $5,000 at the business level, and $6,000 on their Schedule A. The business owner would then also get a credit on their state tax return for the $5,000 payment that the business made, keeping them in the same tax situation as before for state income taxes. 



From 2018 until 2023, 29 states passed legislation allowing PTE's to pay tax in the same manner (8 states have no state income tax). The State of Indiana, in 2023, finally passed legislation to allow business owners this same deduction that the 29 other states had since passed. This is what SB-2 is, it also allows for business owners to receive credit on their state tax return if they paid income taxes to other states through their business. 


As a brief example, if that same business owner operated in Indiana with a net profit of $100,000 they would incur a state tax of 3.23%, or $3,230. Prior to SB-2 the business owner would then owe $3,230 of income taxes with their individual tax return. 


Under SB-2, the business would write a check for $3,230 to the Indiana Dept of Revenue for income taxes and the business owner will get a tax credit for $3,230 because they will still be taxed on that $100,000 at the state level. So the same tax is being paid, only the business pays it now instead of the individual business owner. By having the business pay the tax, we would then make their federal business taxable income $96,770 instead of $100,000. Assuming the business owner is in the 22% tax bracket, that $3,230 payment would equal a federal tax savings of $711. The higher your business net profits, or the higher your federal tax bracket, the greater the savings. 


This presents a great array of tax planning ideas that previously were not at our disposal. Should a husband and wife rental LLC currently being filed as a Schedule E elect to be taxed as a 1065 Partnership? With SB-2 in play, they can now shift the tax burden to the partnership and reduce their federal taxes. The offset is they will have to pay for a 1065 return to be prepared. 


The issue currently facing Hoosier business owners and tax preparers is that no one in the legislature (or lobbyist groups) who pushed for this to be retroactive to 1/1/2022, appears to have consulted the Department of Revenue to help create a form for this tax to actually be paid. And if they did ask, they didn't make sure the form would be ready. As a result, this election can not be made prior to March 31, 2023


The current due date for PTE's is March 15, 2023. This presents a problem.


PTE's will be forced to extend their filing, which is a simple enough process, but one that should not have been required had the bills author (Senator Scott Baldwin) bothered to consult with practicing CPA's, or listened to the concerns of the Indiana CPA Society who opposed the retroactive date for this very reason. However, groups like the Indiana Chamber, who have zero tax background, pushed for the retroactive date because they don't have to deal with the mess that results. Luckily, the Department of Revenue has stated they will not charge late payment penalties or interest on any payments related to this tax through August 31, 2024. This begs the question, if the bill allows for payments a full 16 months after the initial date, why did they pass it in February for the previous year? Why couldn't they get this done in say October? Or even December? 


This then presents the biggest issue for preparers, specifically smaller firms. How do you process your business income tax returns that you typically have from January-April 15th to complete and now have April 1 - April 15 to complete with the new changes, while also getting done all the other work you have in that time? The answer for most will be to extend your tax season, yet again, to account for the ideocracy that is our elected officials attempting to help. 


As a business owner, you now most likely have to delay filing as well. While we can calculate the amounts due (or refunds owed), you wait. The fact that we can't finalize them and move on is extremely frustrating and why Indiana business owners and practitioners need to contact their representatives to tell them this was horrible timing. It is important to emphasize that your local politicians have no idea how this impacts you unless you contact them. 


In Indiana, we also have Personal Property Taxes, which are filed right after income taxes. Typically this is an easy process, and one that the state has allowed us to start to add in with the income taxes when they changed the value date to January 1 instead of March 1. However, in an effort to show they can in fact do more ridiculous timing changes, there is currently House Bill 1430 being discussed which would virtually eliminate the PPT filing. While we are all in favor of this, to be in 2023 and making a tax law change for the 2023 tax filing that has already started, is once again a sign of ignorance. 


View More of Our Most Recent Posts

By Michael Hunsche August 18, 2026
In my last post, I talked about starting this firm from the back of a closet with one client, a makeshift desk, and an old power strip. But I didn’t start a CPA firm because I had always dreamed of owning a CPA firm. I started it because the traditional model didn’t make sense to me — especially after starting a small side business of my own and seeing things from the business owner’s side. Clients would send information into a black hole and wonder when they would hear back. Business owners would meet with their accountant after the year was already over, when most of the opportunities to actually change the outcome were gone. Large firms often reserved their best advice and attention for their largest clients, even though smaller business owners arguably needed that guidance more. Tax returns became the service instead of what I believed they should be: the end result of conversations happening throughout the year. And too often, the accountant knew the numbers but didn’t really know the business. None of that made sense to me. I thought a CPA firm could be more than the place you send documents once a year. I thought we could help business owners make better decisions before those decisions showed up on a tax return. That idea became the foundation of the firm. Pricing was another problem. At the first firm I worked for, we had “dynamic” pricing. In practice, that could mean charging a client more after a good year to supposedly make up for years when their bill had been discounted. Other clients might go an incredibly long time without receiving a bill, only to suddenly get hit with a huge invoice. As someone trying to run a business myself, I couldn’t understand that. How could a business owner budget for a professional relationship without knowing what it was going to cost? The traditional model was built around billing for time, yet employees were constantly being told to work faster. That created the wrong incentives. The focus became completing the deliverable efficiently instead of asking what else the client needed to know. Payroll could become an afterthought. Bookkeeping could become work used to fill the slower months. Questions about a client’s history could be viewed as time taking away from the task at hand. The system rewarded completing work. I wanted a system that rewarded helping the client. So when I started the firm in 2017, the concept was pretty simple. Find out what the client actually needs. Agree on the scope. Give them a predictable monthly price. Review that relationship every 9–12 months and adjust when their needs change. And most importantly, don’t disappear between tax returns. From the beginning, I wanted the relationship to include tax return preparation, mid-year tax planning, year-end planning, and responsive communication throughout the year. At the time, proactive planning and upfront pricing were far less common in the small-business CPA market. A business owner getting a call that said, “Let’s meet in July and see how the first half of the year went,” was not the experience many owners expected from their accountant. But it made perfect sense to me. If we waited until tax season to have that conversation, we weren’t planning anymore. We were reporting history. The response was great — once I could get business owners to give a new firm a chance. Over time, that simple concept grew into something much bigger. People smarter than me helped develop it into what the profession now broadly calls advisory, with a much wider scope and greater ambition than what I originally envisioned. But the underlying idea hasn’t changed. Business owners deserve to know what they’re paying. They deserve honest advice, even when the answer isn’t what they expected. They deserve regular conversations about what is happening in their business and what is coming next. And they deserve a CPA who understands that the goal isn’t simply to produce an accurate tax return. The goal is to help them make better decisions before we get there. That’s why I started the firm. Transparent pricing. Honest advice. Regular conversations.  Built for Business Owners. CPA Led. Strategy Focused.
By Michael Hunsche August 14, 2026
An old power strip from my beginning became an unexpected reminder of how easy it is for business owners to overlook how far they’ve come.
By Michael Hunsche August 11, 2026
Our family-owned CPA firm started with almost no clients, no employees, and a closet for an office. Here’s why we started—and what hasn’t changed.