How the OBBBA Transforms Depreciation Planning for Real-Estate Investors & Owners


Michael Hunsche • November 14, 2025

Share this article

For real-estate owners, developers, and investors, the recently enacted One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) brings meaningful changes to depreciation and expensing rules. These changes offer significant opportunities — but also require careful planning and coordination. As your tax advisors, Hunsche CPA Group is here to walk you through the key reforms, how they apply to real-estate holdings, and what you should be doing today to maximize benefits while avoiding missteps.



What changed: Depreciation & Expensing under OBBBA

Below are the major shifts under OBBBA that affect depreciation and related tax planning for real estate.



1. Permanent 100% Bonus Depreciation for Qualified Property

Under prior law (the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act or TCJA), bonus depreciation — the ability to immediately expense a large portion (or all) of eligible assets — was scheduled to phase down after 2022 and expire by 2027. JD Supra+2National Law Review+2


OBBBA changes that: for property placed in service 
after January 19, 2025, taxpayers now can apply 100% bonus depreciation — permanently, unless changed by future legislation. Grant Thornton+2RSM US+2


In practical terms for real-estate owners, this means that many eligible assets — equipment, furniture/fixtures, land improvements, interior improvements (under certain definitions) — can be written off fully in year one rather than depreciated over multiple years.


2. Expanded §179 Expensing Limits

OBBBA increased the limits under §179 (which allows immediate expensing of certain business property) to support larger immediate deductions. For example, the deduction ceiling is raised and phase-out thresholds increased. Whiteman Osterman & Hanna LLP+1


For real-estate contexts, the caveat remains: §179 generally applies when the property is used in an active trade or business (e.g., a hotel, short-term rental business, or other active real-estate business) — rather than passive long-term rental activity. Schelin Uldricks & Co.+1


3. New Full Expensing Election for Qualified Production Real Property (QPP)

One of the more specialized changes: OBBBA introduces a new elective 100% expensing rule under § 168(n) for “qualified production property” (QPP) — which may include certain non-residential real property used in manufacturing/production activities. RSM US+1


Key requirements:

The property must be non-residential real property used in a qualified production activity. Grant Thornton


Construction (or substantial beginning) must begin after Jan. 19, 2025 and before Dec. 31, 2028 (and placed in service by Dec. 31, 2030) for eligibility. RSM US+1

Original use must begin with the taxpayer; leased property generally does not qualify. KBKG+1


For real-estate developers constructing owner-occupied industrial/manufacturing space, this creates a new path to immediate full write-off of building cost — a game-changer in certain scenarios.


4. Intersection with Other Provisions: Interest Deduction, QBI, State Conformity

The depreciation/expensing changes don’t exist in isolation. For example:


The deduction for business interest under §163(j) returns to an EBITDA-based limitation (beneficial for owners with large non-cash deductions like depreciation) for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2024. National Law Review+1


The 20% Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction (§199A) is made permanent and remains relevant for real-estate businesses operating via pass-through entities. CLA Connect


Many states do not conform to federal bonus depreciation or §179 enhancements — so real-estate owners must check state tax treatment. CPA Pilot+1



Why this matters for real-estate owners & investors

Here are some of the tangible benefits and planning considerations:


Accelerated tax-deduction timing. With full write-off possibilities in year one, owners of eligible assets can significantly reduce taxable income in the acquisition/renovation year, freeing up cash flow.


Improved ROI and reinvestment flexibility. By reducing tax drag upfront, property owners can redeploy capital more quickly into acquisitions, improvements, or new development.


Enhanced cost-segregation opportunities. For properties with many components (e.g., HVAC, interior improvements, land improvements), cost-segregation studies become even more valuable — because identifying shorter-life assets that qualify for 100% bonus depreciation amplifies the benefit.


Active vs passive real-estate distinctions matter. For owners of passive long-term rentals, the ability to leverage expensing or bonus depreciation may be more limited compared with those structured as an active trade or business.


Planning for large capital outlays make sense. If you were considering a major renovation, redevelopment or assets purchase in 2025+, the timing could be especially beneficial given the restored full expensing.


Tax timing and entity structure implications. Because the benefits impact taxable income and due to the interaction with interest limits, NOL rules, passive activity rules, entity choice (LLC, partnership, REIT structure) should be revisited under the new law.



Example scenario

Here’s a simplified illustration:

A client purchases a commercial property and plans a major interior retrofit (e.g., HVAC, lighting, flooring) in 2025. Under prior law, many of those interior improvements might be depreciated over 39 years (or shorter lives via segregation). Under OBBBA:


The client commissions a cost-segregation study, identifies $400,000 of property components with recovery periods of 15 or 20 years or less (e.g., HVAC, lighting, certain interior systems).


Because these components are property with recovery periods ≤ 20 years and placed in service in 2025, 100% bonus depreciation can apply (under the “qualified property” rules) — allowing immediate expensing of the $400,000 instead of depreciating over many years.


The client’s taxable income in 2025 is dramatically reduced, improving cash flow, enabling reinvestment, and increasing return on investment for the retrofit.


Simultaneously, the firm checks state tax treatment, confirms that in the client’s state full bonus depreciation is allowed federally but limited or decoupled at the state level, and advises additional state strategies as needed.



Caveats and things to watch

Written binding contract dates and placed-in-service dates matter. Some property tied to contracts entered before January 20, 2025 might fall under the old phase-down schedule. RSM US+1


Mixed‐use buildings or portions of property that are not used in qualifying activities (especially for QPP) may lose the accelerated benefit — documentation, allocation and careful structuring are key.


For traditional passive residential rental real estate, some of the more aggressive expensing opportunities (e.g., §179) may not apply unless the owner is materially participating or meets the active trade/business test.


State tax conformity is uneven: even if federal law allows full expensing, state treatment may differ — and may create state-federal timing mismatches or adjustment items.


While OBBBA sets many provisions permanently, future legislation or IRS/regulatory guidance could fine-tune definitions, eligibility or interaction rules — monitoring remains important.


Large upfront deductions may generate net operating losses (NOLs) or deferred tax assets — understanding the client’s full tax profile, including other income, entity losses, passive activity and carryforward limitations, is essential.




Conclusion

The OBBBA marks a landmark shift in depreciation and expensing rules that real-estate investors and owners should not ignore. For many clients, the opportunity to accelerate deductions, improve cash flow, and expand investment flexibility is real and timely — but capturing those benefits requires thoughtful planning, accurate documentation and coordination with your CPA and tax advisors. At Hunsche CPA Group, we’re ready to help you assess your portfolio, model the impact of these changes, and structure your next moves to make the most of this new landscape.


View More of Our Most Recent Posts

By Michael Hunsche August 18, 2026
In my last post, I talked about starting this firm from the back of a closet with one client, a makeshift desk, and an old power strip. But I didn’t start a CPA firm because I had always dreamed of owning a CPA firm. I started it because the traditional model didn’t make sense to me — especially after starting a small side business of my own and seeing things from the business owner’s side. Clients would send information into a black hole and wonder when they would hear back. Business owners would meet with their accountant after the year was already over, when most of the opportunities to actually change the outcome were gone. Large firms often reserved their best advice and attention for their largest clients, even though smaller business owners arguably needed that guidance more. Tax returns became the service instead of what I believed they should be: the end result of conversations happening throughout the year. And too often, the accountant knew the numbers but didn’t really know the business. None of that made sense to me. I thought a CPA firm could be more than the place you send documents once a year. I thought we could help business owners make better decisions before those decisions showed up on a tax return. That idea became the foundation of the firm. Pricing was another problem. At the first firm I worked for, we had “dynamic” pricing. In practice, that could mean charging a client more after a good year to supposedly make up for years when their bill had been discounted. Other clients might go an incredibly long time without receiving a bill, only to suddenly get hit with a huge invoice. As someone trying to run a business myself, I couldn’t understand that. How could a business owner budget for a professional relationship without knowing what it was going to cost? The traditional model was built around billing for time, yet employees were constantly being told to work faster. That created the wrong incentives. The focus became completing the deliverable efficiently instead of asking what else the client needed to know. Payroll could become an afterthought. Bookkeeping could become work used to fill the slower months. Questions about a client’s history could be viewed as time taking away from the task at hand. The system rewarded completing work. I wanted a system that rewarded helping the client. So when I started the firm in 2017, the concept was pretty simple. Find out what the client actually needs. Agree on the scope. Give them a predictable monthly price. Review that relationship every 9–12 months and adjust when their needs change. And most importantly, don’t disappear between tax returns. From the beginning, I wanted the relationship to include tax return preparation, mid-year tax planning, year-end planning, and responsive communication throughout the year. At the time, proactive planning and upfront pricing were far less common in the small-business CPA market. A business owner getting a call that said, “Let’s meet in July and see how the first half of the year went,” was not the experience many owners expected from their accountant. But it made perfect sense to me. If we waited until tax season to have that conversation, we weren’t planning anymore. We were reporting history. The response was great — once I could get business owners to give a new firm a chance. Over time, that simple concept grew into something much bigger. People smarter than me helped develop it into what the profession now broadly calls advisory, with a much wider scope and greater ambition than what I originally envisioned. But the underlying idea hasn’t changed. Business owners deserve to know what they’re paying. They deserve honest advice, even when the answer isn’t what they expected. They deserve regular conversations about what is happening in their business and what is coming next. And they deserve a CPA who understands that the goal isn’t simply to produce an accurate tax return. The goal is to help them make better decisions before we get there. That’s why I started the firm. Transparent pricing. Honest advice. Regular conversations.  Built for Business Owners. CPA Led. Strategy Focused.
By Michael Hunsche August 14, 2026
An old power strip from my beginning became an unexpected reminder of how easy it is for business owners to overlook how far they’ve come.
By Michael Hunsche August 11, 2026
Our family-owned CPA firm started with almost no clients, no employees, and a closet for an office. Here’s why we started—and what hasn’t changed.